I’m sorry, bad joke, I know.
Anyway, according to the BBC, the G-spot may not exist: ‘the elusive erogenous zone said to exist in some women may be a myth, say researchers who have hunted for it‘. Or for the xkcd take, look here.
What do you think? I don’t know, if I’m honest. I may be a Christian (not that that’s necessarily relevant) but I’m no stranger to orgasm; but that doesn’t mean that this has anything to do with possession (or otherwise) of a G-spot. And as for women who say that you’re more likely to have a G-spot if you eat the right things or exercise the right way… come on. Do be serious. Anyway, it’s certainly interesting.
Oh, and the comments on the Times Online reporting of the same study are hysterically funny. I especially like this little gem:
“As an elderly, nigh past it male, I can confirm from experience gained years ago in the back if my car that there is most certainly in some women a spot inside the vagina discrete from the clitoris that when stimulated causes an intense climax.
And not necessarily in younger women either.
Whether it is the fabled “G” spot fellows I don’t know but its there alright.” (sic).
Why is it that the moment there’s a news story about sex, exhibitionist commenters seem to feel the need to splurge out entirely unnecessary details about their sex lives? For one thing I really don’t want to know what ‘elderly, nigh past it’ men get up to in the backs of their cars, and for another, well, what I may or may not do behind closed doors is my business, thanks, and not yours, internet.