I Cannot Get Over This Man

Yes, it’s George Monbiot time again. I am always astounded by his incisiveness; but this is something else… .

In his latest article he theorises that the reason we’re all getting our knickers in a twist about the expenses scandal and demanding major political reform here and now is because of the credit crunch (of course) and that the credit crunch is going to hugely affect us because over the last three hundred years we have profited as a country on the backs of those we colonised, and furthermore, completely rode roughshod over, importing the food those countries so sorely needed to fend off famine in eighteenth and nineteenth century Britain; and that even after we gave up all the colonies we still made treaties with them to keep having the same advantages we’d enjoyed for the past three hundred years.

We’re a major world power with no right to that power because we cannot support ourselves except by essentially stealing from other countries, and now, it seems, we can no longer do that, and as reality hits home, we hit out at our government. Or something like that. The full article is excellent and you should read it, here.



Filed under Beliefs, Politics, World

2 responses to “I Cannot Get Over This Man

  1. From the article…
    It might also force politicians of all parties to address… the unelected House of Lords… ”

    Anyone who thinks the fact that House of Lords in unelected is a bad thing, really doesn’t have a grasp on reality.

    I didn’t really follow the logic behind his article to be honest. Seems to be lots of rewriting history, and a lack of understanding of, well, anything. Sentences like “If you have ever wondered how a small, densely-populated country which produces very little supports itself…” are really rather laughable. Seems to me more like a hysterical rant, rather than intelligent comment.

  2. standingonthebrink

    I don’t know what I think personally – I think some of what he says is valid but some of it seems to be drawing comparisons and links that aren’t there to be found or drawn. There was a definite understanding and logic to his article, though, and I can see why he thinks what he thinks. And if it turns out that he’s right, we’re in trouble. I don’t think it’s a hysterical rant, but I’m not completely in agreement with him either.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s